Secure.gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// means you have actually securely connected to the.gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, protected websites.
- About - The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report a Violation
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Attorney general of the United States ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Liberty Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., forbids discrimination by direct service providers of housing, such as property owners and property business as well as other entities, such as municipalities, banks or other loan provider and property owners insurance provider whose discriminatory practices make housing unavailable to individuals because of:
race or color.
faith.
sex.
national origin.
familial status, or.
disability.
In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department might file suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of persons raises a concern of public value. Where force or risk of force is utilized to reject or interfere with fair housing rights, the Department of Justice may set up criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act also provides treatments for handling private complaints of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have been victims of an unlawful housing practice, might submit a problem with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own lawsuit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings fits on behalf of individuals based upon referrals from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the main objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to forbid race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. The majority of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing providers attempt to camouflage their discrimination by offering incorrect information about accessibility of housing, either stating that nothing was readily available or guiding homeseekers to certain locations based upon race. Individuals who get such incorrect info or misdirection may have no understanding that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought lots of cases alleging this kind of discrimination based on race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to uncover this type of hidden discrimination and hold those responsible liable. The majority of the mortgage financing cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually alleged discrimination based upon race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually likewise alleged that municipalities and other local government entities broke the Fair Housing Act when they rejected permits or zoning modifications for housing advancements, or relegated them to primarily minority areas, due to the fact that the prospective homeowners were expected to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based upon faith. This restriction covers instances of overt discrimination versus members of a specific religion as well less direct actions, such as zoning regulations designed to restrict using personal homes as a locations of worship. The variety of cases submitted because 1968 alleging spiritual discrimination is little in comparison to some of the other restricted bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does contain a limited exception that allows non-commercial housing run by a spiritual company to reserve such housing to persons of the very same faith.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Over the last few years, the Department's focus in this location has been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, particularly those who are poor, and with limited housing options, typically have little option but to endure the embarrassment and destruction of unwanted sexual advances or threat having their families and themselves eliminated from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is targeted at proprietors who develop an illogical living environment by requiring sexual favors from tenants or by developing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we seek both to obtain relief for tenants who have actually been dealt with unjustly by a proprietor since of sex and also deter other prospective abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing consequences. In addition, pricing discrimination in mortgage loaning might likewise adversely impact ladies, particularly minority ladies. This kind of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of a person's birth or where his or her forefathers stem. Census information show that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing sector of our nation's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action versus local governments that have tried to decrease or restrict the variety of Hispanic households that might live in their neighborhoods. We have actually sued lending institutions under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have enforced more stringent underwriting requirements on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has likewise sued lenders for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other areas of the nation have actually experienced an increasing variety of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This consists of brand-new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have done something about it against private property managers who have actually victimized such people.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination in housing against families with children under 18. In addition to restricting a straight-out rejection of housing to households with kids, the Act also avoids housing service providers from imposing any unique requirements or conditions on occupants with custody of children. For example, landlords may not find families with kids in any single portion of a complex, put an unreasonable restriction on the total variety of individuals who might reside in a residence, or restrict their access to recreational services offered to other renters. In the majority of circumstances, the changed Fair Housing Act prohibits a housing service provider from refusing to rent or offer to families with kids. However, some centers might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which fulfills the requirements stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has released policies and extra assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination on the basis of disability in all types of housing deals. The Act defines individuals with a disability to mean those individuals with mental or physical problems that considerably restrict one or more significant life activities. The term psychological or physical impairment may include conditions such as blindness, hearing impairment, movement disability, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcohol addiction, drug addiction, chronic fatigue, discovering special needs, head injury, and mental disease. The term major life activity may consist of seeing, hearing, strolling, breathing, performing manual tasks, looking after one's self, finding out, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also secures persons who have a record of such a disability, or are considered having such a disability. Current users of prohibited illegal drugs, individuals convicted for prohibited manufacture or distribution of a controlled compound, sex wrongdoers, and juvenile culprits are not considered handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no defenses to individuals with or without disabilities who provide a direct threat to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether someone poses such a direct risk must be made on a personalized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based on general presumptions or speculation about the nature of a disability. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's securities for individuals with specials needs has actually concentrated on two significant areas. One is insuring that zoning and other regulations concerning land usage are not employed to prevent the property choices of these people, including needlessly limiting common, or gather, property plans, such as group homes. The 2nd location is insuring that freshly constructed multifamily housing is built in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's ease of access requirements so that it is available to and functional by people with impairments, and, in particular, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that restrict discrimination versus people with disabilities, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is implemented by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some people with disabilities may cohabit in congregate living plans, frequently described as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act restricts towns and other regional government entities from making zoning or land usage choices or carrying out land use policies that leave out or otherwise discriminate against individuals with specials needs. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal--
- To use land usage policies or actions that treat groups of individuals with specials needs less favorably than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be an ordinance forbiding housing for individuals with specials needs or a particular kind of special needs, such as mental illness, from finding in a particular area, while enabling other groups of unrelated individuals to cohabit because location.
- To do something about it versus, or deny a permit, for a home due to the fact that of the impairment of people who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a structure authorization for a home due to the fact that it was meant to provide housing for persons with mental retardation.
- To decline to clear up accommodations in land usage and zoning policies and treatments where such lodgings might be required to afford individuals or groups of persons with specials needs an equal chance to use and enjoy housing. What constitutes an affordable lodging is a case-by-case decision. Not all requested adjustments of guidelines or policies are sensible. If an asked for modification imposes an unnecessary financial or administrative concern on a regional federal government, or if an adjustment develops an essential modification in a city government's land use and zoning scheme, it is not a "reasonable" accommodation.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing versus individuals with specials needs to consist of a failure "to develop and construct" certain brand-new multi-family dwellings so that they are accessible to and functional by individuals with disabilities, and especially people who utilize wheelchairs. The Act needs all recently constructed multi-family houses of four or more units intended for first tenancy after March 13, 1991, to have specific functions: an available entrance on an available path, accessible typical and public usage locations, doors sufficiently large to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible paths into and through each residence, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in available area, reinforcements in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and usable kitchen areas and bathrooms set up so that a wheelchair can maneuver about the space.
Developers, builders, owners, and architects responsible for the design or building and construction of brand-new multi-family housing may be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings fail to satisfy these design requirements. The Department of Justice has brought numerous enforcement actions against those who failed to do so. The majority of the cases have actually been solved by authorization decrees providing a variety of kinds of relief, consisting of: retrofitting to bring unattainable functions into compliance where practical and where it is not-- alternatives (monetary funds or other construction requirements) that will attend to making other housing units available; training on the ease of access requirements for those associated with the construction procedure; a mandate that all new housing jobs comply with the ease of access requirements, and monetary relief for those hurt by the offenses. In addition, the Department has actually looked for to promote availability through building regulations.
